News

euthanasia 800 002

Last year I published the article: Do euthanasia drugs cause a painful death? The article was based on research on autopsies of people who died by lethal injection in capital punishment.  

The research indicated that lethal injection usually results in death by pulmonary edema (similar to drowning). This research is important because the same and similar drugs are used for euthanasia.

After publishing the article a physician, who opposes MAiD [Medical Assistance in Dying], told me that these drugs rarely cause death by pulmonary edema.

On September 21 I read a report by Noah Caldwell, Ailsa Chang and Jolie Myers that was published by NPR which further outlined the research from the autopsies of people who died by capital punishment. The report explains:

It was 2016, and the autopsy reports had been given to him (Dr Joel Zivot) by lawyers representing inmates on death row. He had received simple instructions: Interpret the levels of an anesthetic in the blood to determine whether the inmates were conscious during their execution. As an anesthesiologist at Emory University Hospital in Atlanta, Zivot specialized in reading these levels. But as he looked beyond the toxicology reports, something else caught his eye. The lungs were way too heavy.

He checked another autopsy. Again, heavy lungs. The average human lung weighs about 450 grams. Many of these lungs weighed twice that, sometimes more. His best guess was that they were filled with fluid — but he needed a second opinion. 
His colleague Mark Edgar, an anatomical pathologist at Emory, agreed to help. Zivot didn't mention the lungs at all, to see if Edgar would catch the same aberrations. He did. And he confirmed that Zivot's hunch had been correct — the lungs were filled with a mixture of blood and plasma and other fluids. 
It was a severe form of a condition called pulmonary edema, which can induce the feeling of suffocation or drowning. 
Maybe it was a fluke? Zivot and Edgar needed more autopsies to be sure. Lawyers in other states shared autopsies of former clients who had been executed. The evidence explained why multiple inmates in recent years had gasped for air after their executions began.

Eventually, Zivot and Edgar found pulmonary edema occurring in about three-quarters of more than three dozen autopsy reports they gathered.

When selling euthanasia to legislators and voters (New Zealand referendum) the euthanasia lobby claim that death by lethal injection is a quick and painless death. This research is important because people often support euthanasia based on fear of a painful death.

The NPR article continued:

"The autopsy findings were quite striking and unambiguous," says Zivot. He had imagined that lethal injection induced a quick death and would leave an inmate's body pristine, or at least close to it. But the autopsies told another story. 
"I began to see a picture that was more consistent with a slower death," he says. "A death of organ failure, of a dramatic nature that I recognized would be associated with suffering." 
In some cases, there was even froth and foam in the airways: "Frothy fluid present in the lower airways," read one report. 
The froth was a clue: It meant that the inmates were still alive and trying to breathe as their lungs filled with fluid, because froth could form only if air was still passing through the lungs. It also meant that the pulmonary edema was being caused by the first drug given during a lethal injection, since the second drug, a paralytic, stops the inmate's breathing altogether.

Euthanasia and capital punishment both use a three drug system. The first drug is to anesthetize; the second paralyzes; the third stops the heart. Dr Zivot's asked the question:

"How do we ask an inmate whether or not they experience their own death as cruel?"

This question also applies to euthanasia.

In response to the question that these drugs rarely cause death by pulmonary edema, Zivot's has extended his research to 200 autopsy reports with 84% of those reports indicating signs of pulmonary edema. 

The autopsies were on deaths by capital punishment and not euthanasia, nonetheless, the drugs and protocols to cause death are the same or similar to euthanasia.

The article continued:

Philippe Camus, a pulmonologist in Dijon, France ... has spent decades studying and compiling the various ways that drugs can negatively affect the lungs. He says that when a high dose of drugs is rapidly injected into the body, it pushes a concentrated "front" through the bloodstream. Doses vary slightly by states, but many inmates receive 500 milligrams of midazolam; for comparison, in a hospital setting patients may receive 1 or 2 milligrams.

"The quicker the injection, the denser the front, and the higher the risk of causing damage," Camus says.

Specifically, that concentrated front of drugs damages the thin barrier between blood vessels and air sacs in the lungs. Jeffrey Sippel, a pulmonologist who reviewed autopsies obtained by NPR, likens this phenomenon to a river flooding its banks.

"Water is supposed to be in the river, and the banks are supposed to be dry," he says. In this case, the dry banks are the lungs' air sacs, and the river is a network of capillaries; in healthy lungs, they are separated by a thin membrane. "When there is pulmonary edema, that normal relationship is awry. There's water on the banks where it doesn't belong."

When that membrane breaks, fluid from the capillaries enters the air sacs, impeding one's ability to breathe.

"It would be a feeling of drowning, a feeling of suffocation — a feeling of panic, imminent doom," says Sippel.

Based on the autopsy research from capital punishment deaths, death by lethal injection is usually caused by pulmonary edema, which is similar to drowning.

Covering the inhumane symptoms associated with dying by euthanasia with drugs to anesthetize; and drugs to paralyze does not change the nature of the death.

Furthermore, people have the right to know before consenting to euthanasia.

Alex Schadenberg is Executive Director of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition

Protestors800px

You may have seen TV images of the thousands of women and a few men in our capital cities on 15 March.

They were calling on men to change their attitudes and become respectful of women. They wanted governments to ensure that schools teach young people about the need for sexual consent.

Good luck with that.

As Collective Shout Director Melinda Tankard Reist said recently,

“All the best intentions and efforts cannot compete with the world biggest department of education: pornography. If we don’t address pornography’s conditioning of boys, which trains them to accept rape myths — that “no” in fact means “yes” — and which normalises aggression, coercion and domination, [girls and young women] don’t stand a chance.                                                                             

“The porn industry is a mammoth dispenser of sexualised violence and misogyny; it is the world’s most powerful sexual groomer. Boys see girls as something to act-out on rather than fully engage with … the porn industry takes pre-existing harmful codes of masculinity and entitlement and turbo-charges them.”

Research, some of it quite recent, backs up Melinda’s words. Viewing pornography can lower men’s relationship satisfaction – and lead to increased rates of relationship breakdown and divorce. When a male is addicted to pornography, his partner is likely to experience body shame, reduced intimacy, and pressure to perform unwanted acts.

In short, pornography teaches violent attitudes and behaviours to both adolescents and adults. It is effectively a rape manual. And as Melinda says, it is the major sex educator of Australian children. The majority have viewed it from their early teens – on their own smartphones or those of their friends.

If you have been a long-time FamilyVoice supporter, you probably already knew this. Our founding chairman, clinical psychologist Dr John Court, did some key research in the early 1970s.

He found serious flaws in an earlier Danish study that claimed pornography “reduced sex crimes”. He went to Denmark in order to personally inspect police crime reports from before and after legalisation of pornography in that country.

He found that minor sex crimes did indeed go down after porn, especially hardcore porn, became freely available. No surprise there – most such crimes were no longer illegal!

But serious sex crimes such as rape increased significantly.

So what is the answer to this very serious problem? Merely telling school children to stay away from violent pornography, as some “experts” advise, doesn’t appear to be working!

Peter Stevens, our FamilyVoice Victoria Director, is taking a different approach. For some years he has been urging federal MPs to back legislation mandating a “cleanfeed” internet service by all providers.                                                                                               

This would mean that service providers would block harmful content including pornography, gambling, suicide and terrorism promotion unless adult customers specifically request it. The legislation would mandate age verification software to prevent access to those sites by those under 18.

“A ‘cleanfeed’ system would not be foolproof,” Peter says. “But it would be a big step in the right direction.

“We’ve received positive responses from government members, but we are still waiting for real action.”

Please make this a matter for prayer!

Peter Downie - National Director

FamilyVoice Australia

radio

Click here to listen

ParliamentHouse800px

Federal Attorney-General Christian Porter has said he is “not particularly religious”.

Moreover, he has been described by a former Labor MP as a “bit of a lad” in his university days. He has admitted that he has not always been “a good husband” to his wife, from whom he is now separated. So he’s no saint.

Nevertheless, the recent accusation that he raped a 16-year-old girl in Sydney in January 1988, when he was 17 and both were participating in a national debating competition, is just that: an allegation.

The baying mob of journalists at his press conference on 3 March had to be seen to be believed. The rule of law, and the time-honoured legal principle that an accused must be presumed innocent unless proved guilty, flew out the window.

The Attorney-General strenuously and categorically denied the allegations made in the 33-page letter. He stated, again and again, that the alleged event never happened – pointing out that he was just a teenage boy at the time.

The presumption of innocence is fundamental to our society.  Abandon it and our society would degenerate into mob rule. Anyone – you, I or any of our leaders – could have our life destroyed by a single unproved allegation. The Salem witch trials in Massachusetts in 1692-3 tragically resulted in nineteen people hanged merely based on allegations.

Australia has a rigorous justice system for testing allegations.  First, a matter must be reported to the police, who assess whether there is enough “admissible evidence” to warrant prosecution.

For evidence to be “admissible” it must be first-hand knowledge, not (second-hand) hearsay. One difficulty with the allegations against Christian Porter is that the alleged victim tragically took her own life on 25 June 2020 and cannot now give evidence.

The allegations are contained in a detailed, but anonymous letter apparently from the now-deceased woman, sent to several politicians by the deceased woman’s friends. Since the friends did not witness the alleged events, the allegations are essentially hearsay.

While she was alive, the woman refused to make a statement to the police, who would require her to swear or affirm that the statement was true. Furthermore, two days before she took her own life, she asked the police to drop the complaint, for medical and personal reasons.

Notes made by Christian Porters accuser as featured in a dossier containing her rape allegations 002

Notes made by Christian Porter’s accuser, as featured in a dossier containing her rape allegations

As a student, the complainant was said to be a brilliant debater. Sadly, over subsequent decades she suffered from long bouts of mental illness, including a bipolar disorder. This can be associated with delusions.

Extracts of the dossier containing the allegations, published in The Australian, are rather strange.  The complainant says she only really understood her memories “once my Sydney-based psychologist Katie Thorncraft referred me to The Body Keeps Score: Brain, Mind and Body in the Healing of Trauma (Van Der Kolk).” Bessel van der Kolk is a defender of discredited repressed-memory therapy.

Katie Thorncraft is listed as a staff psychologist at a Sydney centre owned by a “Clairvoyant and Certified Angel Intuitive”.  Thorncraft is a practitioner of quasi-hypnotic counselling that has been subject to evidentiary restrictions in Australian courts because of its potential to affect memory.

On 2 March 2021 the NSW police closed their investigation. We may never know the whole truth.

But as the Bible says in Deuteronomy 19:15, “One witness is not enough to convict a man accused of any crime or offence he may have committed. A matter must be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.”

Christian Porter is entitled to be presumed innocent.

Peter Downie - National Director

FamilyVoice Australia

radio

Click here to listen