News

Published: 28 July 2020

A Christian Ministry which helps individuals overcome unwanted same-sex attraction has been advised that it will lose its bank account.

Core Issues Trust, a non-profit Christian ministry, supports men and women who voluntarily want to deal with unwanted same-sex attraction and gender dysphoria.

In July, Twitter users began pressuring Barclays Bank to stop providing financial services to CIT. Barclay’s Bank, one of the UK’s biggest banks, subsequently notified CIT that its bank account would be terminated in September.

The International Federation for Therapeutic and Counselling Choice, an initiative supported by CIT, has also been informed that its account will be closed.

CEO of CIT Mike Davidson said he rejected the accusatory term “conversion therapy”:

“This is a pejorative, imposed term, coined by an American gay activist, Dr Douglas Haldeman in 1991, that names some extremes such as electro-shock and aversion techniques only ever conducted by medics, long since abandoned from the 60s, or extreme behaviours already outlawed such as ‘corrective’ rape for which there are no prosecutions in the UK.

“Because the term speaks of talking therapies and counselling as ‘pseudo-science’ in association with these extremes, to be heard defending talking therapy and counselling for unwanted same-sex attractions is then taken to be a defence of the indefensible ‘Conversion Therapy’ label.”

UK-based advocacy group Christian Concern reported that CIT has been subjected to an abusive harassment campaign:

On social media there has been a campaign of aggressive trolling and dehumanising of Mike Davidson, Trustee Matthew Grech and staff worker Kylie Delia – extending also to personal accounts. One text message hoped that staff family members are raped and killed. A text message with a satanic image was sent to the CIT mobile phone. Multiple complaints to social media sites were made about CIT. Videos and live broadcasts, previously reviewed and agreed as valid adverts with the platform were taken down by Facebook as was the CIT banner on more than one occasion. CIT Instagram content was also removed, despite being acceptable for more than two years. CIT staff were blocked from posting on Facebook and were unable to block trolls.

“If it is CIT first, it will be churches next,” said Andrea Williams CEO of Christian Concern.

“If banks and other service providers start to placate social media campaigns by unilaterally terminating their accounts then the UK will be a very difficult place for Biblically faithful Christian ministries."

In 2016, prominent financial institution PayPal announced it would boycott the city of Charlotte in US state North Carolina, after the city restricted men who think they are women from using female restrooms.

In retaliation for the move to protect women and girls, PayPal announced it would axe a plan that would have seen 400 jobs and a $3.6 million investment in the city.

Published: 24 July 2020

A survey in the UK has found that close to half the population oppose easing restrictions to enable gender to be changed on official documents.

YouGov conducted an online poll of 1,688 adults in June and found 47% opposed moves to make it easier to change gender on documents, while only 28% supported the move.

According to UK government estimates, between 200,000 and 500,000 people in the UK claim to have a gender different to their biological sex.

At present, 5,500 of these people have legally changed their birth certificate from the biological reality.

The YouGov poll also found that most oppose giving individuals who claim a gender different from their biological sex access to opposite sex bathrooms unless they have had “sex-change” surgery.

The survey highlights that the transgender movement, which has been heavily marketed by the mainstream media in recent years, has made great inroads into convincing people that gender is a social construct.

The poll found that 40% agreed with the statement that “a transgender woman is a woman”, while 36 percent disagreed.

But there are reasons for hope with signs the tide is turning back to a common sense view of gender.

World Rugby is looking at banning men who think they are women from playing women’s rugby.

A World Rugby report detailed that there is “at least a 20-30% greater risk” of injury when a female player is tackled by a man who thinks he’s a woman.

The document reported the obvious: men who think they’re women have significant physical strength advantages over women.

There is also a growing detransition movement, with those suffering gender dysphoria seeking to return to living as their biological sex.

Published: 23 July 2020

Sir John Kerr with a portrait of the Queen

You may have heard about the kerfuffle over recently published letters between Australia’s Governor-General Sir John Kerr and Buckingham Palace back in 1975.

In one sense they reveal nothing new – confirming that Sir John dismissed then Prime Minister Gough Whitlam on 11 November before he informed the Queen.

The events leading up to that dismissal have been described many times. They include the books “Matters for Judgment” by Sir John Kerr and “Head of State” by his private secretary Sir David Smith.

In October 1975, the Whitlam Government was in trouble. The Senate was refusing to pass the supply bills needed to authorise payment for Whitlam’s controversial spending program.

The Australian Constitution (s 57) wisely provides a way to resolve stalemates of this kind between the two houses of federal parliament. Prime Minister Whitlam could have asked the Governor-General to dissolve the entire parliament and hold elections for both the House of Representatives and the full Senate – a “double dissolution”.

If Whitlam had won such an election, he could have convened a joint sitting of both houses to pass the supply bills. But he refused to follow the constitutional process, possibly fearing an election loss.

What started as a political problem for Whitlam then became a constitutional problem for Kerr. Whitlam was seeking to govern without supply, in breach of the Constitution. Kerr’s duty as Governor-General was to ensure that parliament operated in accordance with the Constitution. A clash was inevitable.

The events that followed throw considerable light on the “reserve powers” of the Governor-General.

The Governor-General’s “ordinary powers” include assenting to laws passed by both houses of parliament and acting in accordance with the advice of Commonwealth ministers. In a small number of matters, the Governor-General exercises “reserve powers”, acting without ministerial advice.

The two most important reserve powers are to appoint or dismiss the Prime Minister (s 64). Ordinarily, by convention, the Governor-General will appoint the leader of the party or coalition with a majority in the House of Representatives. In unusual circumstances, the Governor-General may dismiss or appoint a Prime Minister on his own initiative.

On 11 November 1975, John Kerr was faced with a situation that needed to be resolved by the Australian people in a general election. Since calling an election is an “ordinary power”, Kerr could only do this on the advice of the Prime Minister, which Whitlam refused to give. The only way an election could be called was for Kerr to dismiss Whitlam and appoint Malcolm Fraser as caretaker prime minister, on condition that Fraser would advise him to call an election.

Fraser agreed. The election a few weeks later gave him a landslide win, endorsing the Governor-General’s action.

The correspondence with the Palace confirms that the Queen could not tell Kerr what to do, since the reserve powers of the Crown under the Australian Constitution can only be exercised by the Governor-General.

These events, and the Palace letters, confirm that the Constitution makes the Governor-General the effective Australian Head of State.

Those who are campaigning for “an Australian Head of State” ignore the fact that the past eleven Governors-General have all been Australians – from Sir Paul Hasluck in 1969 to David Hurley today.

Australia has one of the oldest constitutions in the world. Drafted by leading Australian statesmen, many of whom professed a Christian faith, it has given us stable government for nearly 120 years.

FamilyVoice has defended the Australian Constitution for nearly 50 years, and will continue to do so with your help and support.

Peter Downie - National Director

Published: 22 July 2020

 

The opposition and minor parties have jointly expressed alarm that Premier Daniel Andrews’ new Crisis Council of Cabinet will hand Andrews and seven of his ministers almost unchecked powers for six months.

In late April, the Labor government used its numbers to quash a Greens motion to set up a cross-party committee to scruti­nise the decisions of the Crisis Council, which will operate until at least September 30.

The Labor government instead handed oversight to the Labor-chaired Public Accounts and Estimates Committee, which has a majority of Labor members.

A new omnibus Bill in Victoria has passed after just three days of scrutiny, even as the Bill made unprecedented amendments to statutes addressing the health system, courts, prisons, local government and the rental market.

The Bill has troubled Australian Lawyers Alliance Victorian presi­dent Jeremy King, who said, “The proposed new laws will im­pose detention conditions that amount to full-time lockdown and isolation for some prisoners.”

Criminal Bar Association of Victoria chair Daniel Gurvich, QC, has told the Sydney Morning Herald that about one third of the bill altered a wide range of criminal justice issues, like judge-only trials and the placement of prisoners, but industry experts and MPs were given no time for consultation.

The Bill gives the Crisis Council the power to change justice system regulations without having to pass legislation in the Parliament, “so that justice processes can be quickly adapted to changing public health requirements”.

The majority of the amendments expire in September, except several environmental and rental market changes, which will be reviewed in 2021.

Before the Bill was passed in full, Victorian Liberals Leader Mi­chael O’Brien said the 305 page bill was not adequately scruti­nised, with just three days of examination.

“The Opposition was only provided with the Bill on Monday night, leaving little time for consultation with the many Victo­rians whose lives will be affected by it before it is debated on Thursday.”

FamilyVoice Victoria State Director Peter Stevens said, “It is in­appropriate to sacrifice the oversight of power for temporary safety. As U.S. President Benjamin Franklin warned, ‘Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.’ ”